Apparently, you have to have qualifications before you can criticize movie trailers now. You can't just chalk it up to taste anymore. You have to prove your impartiality before you can speak on movies now. I don't know where this shit started, but it really needs to stop. The Batman v. Superman trailer was leaked over the weekend, and naturally, some folks didn't like it, but folks got mad when they dared express that online. Like, more than usual.
We're talking about a movie trailer about a fictitious alien that wants to be friends fighting a fictitious rich guy with an inability to let go of the past. It sounds like the plot to a Pixar movie, but people were acting like they were investigating a murder, trying to figure out the motives of people who didn't like it. This isn't exactly serious scholarship here. Taking on critics of this movie trailer isn't going to get you a job at The Atlantic.
It just blows my hair back when people get this serious over fictional characters, as if it's going to make a bit of difference either way. Instead of people just enjoying the fact that we're all nerds, people are out here acting like people who didn't like it are going to block off the theaters in an act of censorship. People are actually drawing conclusions about the characters of real, living people based on what they thought about a movie trailer. Because, as we know, movie trailers are the modern iteration of Rorschach tests.
And the thing is, I don't think people defending the trailer really understand where the problem is coming from. People aren't loving the way this movie is turning out (and the one before it) because it continues the Batman-ization of the DC Universe, and it was something that a lot of people could see coming after The Dark Knight came out.
See, Batman is grim and gritty. He's tormented. He wreaks vengeance on those who wronged him so that others don't have to suffer like he did. Basically, this dude is broken inside and uses that to punch criminals until they're broken like him. That formula for a superhero made Warner Bros. a billion dollars. And because movie executives are generally unimaginative, they said, "Hey, Superman is having trouble. Why not make him like Batman?" You know, completely ignoring the context surrounding Superman's movies.
I mean, the problem with Superman Returns wasn't that Superman isn't tormented, it's that it was two and a half hours of washing Richard Donner's balls. But who has time for a true examination of the issues?
And that's why Man of Steel is the way it is. That's why Superman is morose, everything is dimly lit, and there's no sense of joy or fun in a single frame of the movie. That's why Superman doesn't save anyone. Superman lives in Batman's world now, and in Batman's world, you need to learn that life is shit.
Except that's not the world Superman lives in. Superman is supposed to represent all of those good things. He tries to save people before he punches people. He's supposed to inspire people to be good and do better. He always tries to de-escalate the situation, even though he's powerful enough to turn the person in front of him into a fine, red mist. That's what makes him Superman. Of course he can kill everyone on Earth, but he doesn't want to. He wants to show us a better way. Even if he's existing in Batman's dark, depressing, basement of a world, at the very least, he needs to be that. He wasn't, and right there is the difference in opinion on Man of Steel.
Superman fans didn't need for Superman to change. Batman fans needed for Superman to change. And Batman fans loved that movie.
That's why some people weren't excited to see the Batman v. Superman trailer, because they're worried that it's gonna be more of the same: A Superman that Superman fans don't recognize. And there's a huge possibility of that if the movie is based on "The Dark Knight Returns," a story that paints Superman as a government-owned bitch. The only people who want to see that are Batman fans. It has nothing to do with a secret love for Marvel or an inability to let go of the Donner Superman movies or any other of the silly shit I've seen thrown out there this weekend. Maybe it just doesn't look that good to some people. We're talking about art, not an arms treaty.
We won't know for sure until the movie gets released, but in the meantime, dial back the hostility. We're all allowed to have opinions, and none of us need to justify them to you.
Hating all your favorite stuff in long form essays since 2004. Follow @ThadOchocinco on Twitter.
Showing posts with label comics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label comics. Show all posts
Monday, April 20, 2015
Monday, February 02, 2015
The Real Issue With the X-Men: Apocalypse Casting
Last week, Bryan Singer announced the recasting of Cyclops, Jean Grey, and Storm for X-Men: Apocalypse, and nobody really seemed to care, because who the fuck are these people? They're like the cast of the new Fantastic Four flick, except for Michael B. Jordan. In fact, they're so anonymous that they might be the same people.
The Storm casting did get some buzz from Storm fans, because she is once again being played by some girl who doesn't fit the Storm mold. I get it, because everyone wants to see their favorites represented properly on screen. It's the reason why I have decided that the Transformers movies are nothing more than a series of night terrors filled with slow-motion action shots and blurry metal shards that I can't wake up from. Storm fans (myself included) want to see their girl shown as the powerful African leader that she is, instead of the sidekick to Jean with a white wig that she's become.
But the really important issue with this recasting hasn't even been addressed: We no longer have to watch Wolverine's love affair with Jean Grey that never made a lick of sense. I assume it won't be there, because it would be really, really creepy.
See, I'm a masochist, evidently, because I've watched all of the X-Men movies. And I watched them closely enough to realize that Wolverine knew Jean Grey for maybe a week, in total movie time. So watching him tearfully kill Jean in the third one, and dream about her years after the fact, always made me sick. I should have been crying, because I was the one who sat through X-Men: The Last Stand.
That plot thread is something that is well known to folks who read the comics. For a couple of decades, the comics teased the idea that Jean and Wolverine had a long smoldering attraction for each other, and in another world, they might have been together. But Scott had that on lock (for reasons that continue to mystify us), so Jean would never act on it, even though Wolverine would sometimes press the issue.
In the flicks, Wolverine met Jean, spent almost no time with her in the couple of days he tooled around the mansion, then left the X-Men for an undetermined amount of time. He showed up back out there just in time for them to get invaded, and never saw Jean again until a few minutes before she died. She was an evil zombie throughout the next movie, so it's not like she was in a position to further explore their relationship. Wolverine worked hard on his chest to impress her, so her rejection forced him to kill her. Some of this might have been made up, because that third movie was so awful, and I really don't want to watch it again.
But saying that Wolverine knew Jean for a week is being generous.
It's kinda like in Man of Steel, where Superman and Lois have no reason throughout the movie to get together, but they still have to kiss at the end, because that's the expectation. Wolverine is a dude who trusts no one and hasn't for decades, but he meets this girl who's already booed up, spends no time with her, but when she dies, he's suddenly so close to her that he's on the brink of tears? And in the next movie, he struggles to kill her, even though he hasn't had a problem killing complete strangers since this trilogy started? Even though these movies were supposed to walk their own path, Wolverine and Jean had to eye-bathe each other, because those were the times. Even if it doesn't make sense.
That's the kind of foolishness that this recasting gets us from up under. Sure, Storm is still underwhelming (and probably wasn't going to be a big part of the movie, so they're just filling a roster spot), but we're just that much closer to a movie that makes sense.
Labels:
comic book movies,
comic books,
comics,
Fox,
Marvel,
movies,
X-Men,
X-Men: Apocalypse
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)